Design of Working Facilities Based on Posture Risk Assessment and Anthropometry

Nofierni Nofierni(1*), Debby Patmawati(2), Fadli Aunurrofiq(3),


(1) Universitas Esa Unggul
(2) Universitas Esa Unggul
(3) Universitas Esa Unggul
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The operators on assembly lines are complaining about pain in their muscle and joints when carrying out work. This study aimed to assess posture risk on assembly line with manual work, and propose appropriate design for work station facilities. The research was conducted  to operators in the n transformer assembly lines. The method used to evaluate the working posture effort and risk was the combined Nordic Body Map and  Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Based on the RULA method, the operator's body position is at high risk with a score of seven (7), so immediate working corrections are needed. The current faulty design of work stations that are not in accordance with ergonomic principles causes work musculoskeletal disorder in wound core assembly line operators. Based on the lengthy analysis of the faulty operator postures in the wound core assembly, a new table and chair design was proposed. 

Keywords – Anthropometry, Ergonomics, Manual Work, Posture, Risk Assessment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Kumar Nayak, and E. Kim. “Development of a fully automated RULA assessment system based on computer vision”.. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2021.

ErgoPlus. Assessment Framework for Industrial Assembly Workstations-A Case Study Middlesworth, Matt. “Step-by-Step Guides to Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA).”. 2019. https://ergo-plus.com/rula-assessment-tool-guide/

K. Cristiane Brazil, T. A, Pottorff, M. Miller, J. Malgorzata.. “Using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment to examine the effect of the new Hotel Housekeeping California Standard”. Applied Ergonomics vol. 106, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103868

I Wilson Taifa. ”Anthropometric measurements for ergonomic design of students’furniture in India. Engineering Science and Technology, 2017.

W. Macdonald, J. Oakman, “The problem with ergonomics injuries: What can ergonomists do?”Applied Ergonomic, vol. 103, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.

E. Rauch, C. Linder , P. Dallasega.” Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0”.Computers & Industrial Engineering Vol 139. 2020.

T. D. Johnson, L Goldenberg, R.A. Parker, F. A. Huppert, “Towards a capabilities database to inform inclusive design: Experimental investigation of effective survey-based predictors of human-product interaction,” Applied Ergonomic, vol. 43, no. 4, p. 713-726, 2015,doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.005.

M. Chamorro-Koc, V. Popovic, M. Emmison, “Human experience and product usability: Principles to assist the design of user–product interactions”Applied Ergonomic, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 648-656, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.05.004.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36722/sst.v10i2.3610

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


LP2M (Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan Masyarakat)

Universitas AL-AZHAR INDONESIA, Lt.2 Ruang 207

Kompleks Masjid Agung Al Azhar

Jl. Sisingamangaraja, Kebayoran Baru

Jakarta Selatan 12110

Visitor

 This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0