Tantangan Resolusi Konflik dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Perdamaian di Suriah

Sabiruddin -

Abstract


The conflict in Syria has been going on for more than a decade, and is inflicting significant damage on the Middle East region. The complexity of the conflict in Syria is partly due to the involvement of regional and global powers. In this context, global peace efforts are an important focus for dealing with the conflict. This study aims to analyze the interests in the conflict in Syria and global peace efforts in dealing with it. This research was conducted using exploratory qualitative research methods. The theory used in this study is the theory of conflict resolution and peace in international relations. The research findings show that although efforts to achieve global peace continue, a complex set of challenges on the ground as well as prolonged geopolitical tensions continue to be major obstacles in the search for a peaceful solution for Syria.

References


Abdillah, M. (2021). Islam Agama Kedamaian Merawat Kemajemukan dan Kerukunan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas.

Akhmedov, V. (2022). The Syrian Revolution. In J. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev, Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century (pp. 707-723). Berlin: Springer Nature.

Alam, K. (2019). Pax Syriana: The Staying Power of Bashar Al Assad. Asian Affairs, 50(1), 1-17.

Cengiz, S. (2020). Assessing the Astana Peace Process for Syria: Actors, Approaches, and Differences. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 7(2), 200-214.

Fortunada, J. A., Mardialina, M., & Rizki, K. (2021). Analisis Keputusan Amerika Serikat dalam Mengeluarkan Kebijakan Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) terhadap Rusia. Indonesian Journal of Global Discourse, 3(2), 83-101.

Iskandar. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.

Kelman, Herbert. (2005). Building Trust Among Enemies: The Central Challenge for International Conflict Resolution. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 639–650.

Lipschutz, R. D. (2013). Beyond the Neoliberal Peace: From Conflict Resolution to Social Reconciliation. Social Justice, 25(4), 5–19.

Mitchell, S. M. (2002). A Kantian System? Democracy and Third-Party Conflict Resolution. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 749. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088431

Mudore, S. B., & Safitri, N. (2019). Dinamika Perang Suriah: Aktor dan Kepentingan . Politea: Jurnal Politik Islam, 2(2), 87-88.

Mustofa, A. Z. (2021). Keterlibatan Amerika Serikat dan Iran dalam Konflik Di Suriah Pasca Arab Spring. Tazkir: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman, 7(2), 185–206.

Rousseau, D. L. (2007). Identity, Power, and Threat Perception A Cross-National Experimental Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51.

Schumacher, T., & Nitoiu, C. (2015). Russia’s foreign policy towards North Africa in the wake of the Arab Spring. Mediterranean Politics, 20(1), 99.

Somantri, G. R. (2005, Desember). Memahami Metode Kualitatif. MAKARA, 9(2), 57-65.

Suntana, I. (2015). Politik Hubungan Internasional Islam: Siyasah Dauliyah. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Tripathi, D. (2023). Afghanistan and the Vietnam Syndrome: Comparing US and Soviet Wars. Berlin: Springer Nature.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Program studi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia

Jalan Sisingamangaraja, Kompleks Masjid Agung Al Azhar,

Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta Selatan