Acoustic Panel from Coconut Fiber and Spent Coffee Ground as Sound-Absorbing Material for Sustainability

Authors

  • Yessie Widya Sari IPB University
  • Pristy Nabila IPB University
  • Salsabilla Bayah IPB University
  • Annisa Azahra IPB University
  • Rohul Hartman IPB University
  • Angga Saputra IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36722/sst.v11i3.5753

Abstract

 

Conventional building materials are energy-intensive and generate substantial waste, motivating the valorization of agricultural by products into sustainable acoustic materials. This study developed an acoustic panel from Coconut Fiber (CF) and Spent Coffee Grounds (SCG) bound with a cassava starch-based adhesive, with SCG incorporated at 0%, 15%, and 30% (samples A1, A2, and A3, respectively). SCG addition increased panel density from 208.9 kg/m3 (A1) to 247.5 and 268.7 kg/m3 for A2 and A3. Tensile testing showed that SCG reduced the maximum stress while increasing the Young's modulus, indicating a trade-off between ductility and stiffness. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that SCG particles bridged the coconut fiber network, altering the pore structure and air-flow resistivity. Sound absorption coefficients measured across 250-5000 Hz using the impedance tube method showed that A2 (85% CF, 15% SCG) achieved the best overall performance, reaching coefficients of 0.86 at 500 Hz and 0.69 at 250 Hz and outperforming A1 and A3, particularly at low-to-mid frequencies. Excessive SCG in A3 reduced absorption due to increased density and reduced porosity. These findings demonstrate that CF-SCG composite panels are a promising, low-cost, biobased alternative to conventional acoustic materials and SCG for balancing sound absorption performance with sustainable resource valorization.

References

[1] M. E. Arias, F. Farinosi, E. Lee, A. Livino, J. Briscoe, and P. R. Moorcroft, “Impacts of climate change and deforestation on hydropower planning in the Brazilian Amazon,” Nat. Sustain., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 430–436, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-0492-y.

[2] UNEP, “2023 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction Beyond foundations Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction Beyond foundations Mainstreaming sustainable solutions to cut emissions from the buildings sector,” 2024, doi: 10.59117/20.500.11822/45095.

[3] A. Shojaei, R. Ketabi, M. Razkenari, H. Hakim, and J. Wang, “Enabling a circular economy in the built environment sector through blockchain technology,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 294, p. 126352, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126352.

[4] J.-C. Lao, B.-T. Huang, Y. Fang, L.-Y. Xu, J.-G. Dai, and S. P. Shah, “Strain-hardening alkali-activated fly ash/slag composites with ultra-high compressive strength and ultra-high tensile ductility,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 165, p. 107075, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.107075.

[5] L. Lujan, M. L. Goñi, and R. E. Martini, “Cellulose–Chitosan Biodegradable Materials for Insulating Applications,” ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 10, no. 36, pp. 12000–12008, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03538.

[6] A. Vinod, M. R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, and S. Fischer, “Fully bio-based agro-waste soy stem fiber reinforced bio-epoxy composites for lightweight structural applications: Influence of surface modification techniques,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 303, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124509.

[7] S. Lawanwadeekul, N. Jun-On, P. Kongthavorn, T. Sangkas, and S. Daothong, “Chemical-free thermal-acoustic panels from agricultural waste for sustainable building materials,” Cleaner Materials, vol. 12, p. 100245, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2024.100245.

[8] L. Cao, Q. Fu, Y. Si, B. Ding, and J. Yu, “Porous materials for sound absorption,” Composites Communications, vol. 10, pp. 25–35, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2018.05.001.

[9] D. Zhang, X. Zhou, Y. Gao, and L. Lyu, “Structural Characteristics and Sound Absorption Properties of Waste Hemp Fiber,” Coatings, vol. 12, no. 12, 2022, doi: 10.3390/coatings12121907.

[10] N. H. Bhingare and S. Prakash, “Effect of Polyurethane Resin Addition on Acoustic Performance of Natural Coconut Coir Fiber,” Journal of Natural Fibers, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2902–2913, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1836545.

[11] H. Arumugam, B. Krishnasamy, G. Perumal, A. D. A, M. I. Abdul Aleem, and A. Muthukaruppan, “Bio-composites of rice husk and saw dust reinforced bio-benzoxazine/epoxy hybridized matrices: Thermal, mechanical, electrical resistance and acoustic absorption properties,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 312, p. 125381, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125381.

[12] S. Ehsan Samaei, U. Berardi, H. Asilian Mahabadi, P. Soltani, and E. Taban, “Optimization and modeling of the sound absorption behavior of polyurethane composite foams reinforced with kenaf fiber,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 202, p. 109176, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109176

[13] M. S. Lekshmi, S. Vishnudas, and K. R. Anil, “Experimental investigation on acoustic performance of coir fiber and rice husk acoustic panels,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 204, p. 109244, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109244

[14] T. Yang, L. Hu, X. Xiong, M. Petrů, M. T. Noman, R. Mishra, and J. Militký, “Sound absorption properties of natural fibers: A review,” Oct. 02, 2020, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/su12208477.

[15] T. Moussa, J. Maalouf, C. Bliard, B. Abbes, C. Badouard, M. Lachi, S. D. S. V. Sodré, L. Bufalino, F. Bogard, F. Beaumont, and G. Polidori, “Spent Coffee Grounds as Building Material for Non-Load-Bearing Structures,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 5, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15051689.

[16] J. Y. Choi, B. Y. Yun, Y. U. Kim, Y. Kang, S. C. Lee, and S. Kim, “Evaluation of thermal/acoustic performance to confirm the possibility of coffee waste in building materials in using bio-based microencapsulated PCM,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 294, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118616.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

JURNAL AL-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI