Design of Working Facilities Based on Posture Risk Assessment and Anthropometry

Authors

  • Nofierni Nofierni Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Debby Patmawati Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Fadli Aunurrofiq Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36722/sst.v10i2.3610

Abstract

The operators on assembly lines are complaining about pain in their muscle and joints when carrying out work. This study aimed to assess posture risk on assembly line with manual work, and propose appropriate design for work station facilities. The research was conducted  to operators in the n transformer assembly lines. The method used to evaluate the working posture effort and risk was the combined Nordic Body Map and  Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Based on the RULA method, the operator's body position is at high risk with a score of seven (7), so immediate working corrections are needed. The current faulty design of work stations that are not in accordance with ergonomic principles causes work musculoskeletal disorder in wound core assembly line operators. Based on the lengthy analysis of the faulty operator postures in the wound core assembly, a new table and chair design was proposed. 

Keywords – Anthropometry, Ergonomics, Manual Work, Posture, Risk Assessment.

Author Biographies

Nofierni Nofierni, Universitas Esa Unggul

Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering

Debby Patmawati, Universitas Esa Unggul

Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering

Fadli Aunurrofiq, Universitas Esa Unggul

Master of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business

References

G. Kumar Nayak, and E. Kim. “Development of a fully automated RULA assessment system based on computer vision”.. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2021.

ErgoPlus. Assessment Framework for Industrial Assembly Workstations-A Case Study Middlesworth, Matt. “Step-by-Step Guides to Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA).”. 2019. https://ergo-plus.com/rula-assessment-tool-guide/

K. Cristiane Brazil, T. A, Pottorff, M. Miller, J. Malgorzata.. “Using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment to examine the effect of the new Hotel Housekeeping California Standard”. Applied Ergonomics vol. 106, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103868

I Wilson Taifa. ”Anthropometric measurements for ergonomic design of students’furniture in India. Engineering Science and Technology, 2017.

W. Macdonald, J. Oakman, “The problem with ergonomics injuries: What can ergonomists do?”Applied Ergonomic, vol. 103, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.

E. Rauch, C. Linder , P. Dallasega.” Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0”.Computers & Industrial Engineering Vol 139. 2020.

T. D. Johnson, L Goldenberg, R.A. Parker, F. A. Huppert, “Towards a capabilities database to inform inclusive design: Experimental investigation of effective survey-based predictors of human-product interaction,” Applied Ergonomic, vol. 43, no. 4, p. 713-726, 2015,doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.005.

M. Chamorro-Koc, V. Popovic, M. Emmison, “Human experience and product usability: Principles to assist the design of user–product interactions”Applied Ergonomic, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 648-656, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.05.004.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-11

Issue

Section

JURNAL AL-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI