Monitoring Komunikasi Program MBKM pada Mahasiswa Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia

Imsar Gunawan; Manik Sunuantari; Kussusanti Santi; Soraya Soraya; Safira Hasna; Nurul Robbi Sepang

doi:10.36722/jaiss.v3i1.994

Monitoring Komunikasi Program MBKM pada Mahasiswa Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia

Imsar Gunawan, Manik Sunuantari, Kussusanti Santi, Soraya Soraya, Safira Hasna, Nurul Robbi Sepang

Abstract

Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) program aims to prepare students to achieve careers in the future according to their aspirations. With MBKM, students have the opportunity to be independent in building their competencies by learning directly from practical experience in the industry in synergy with the campus academic system. This study aims to measure the quality of communication in the MBKM program, using the concepts of comprehension, conviction, and satisfaction. The research method used is descriptive quantitative, with 65 respondents participating in the MBKM Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia in 2021. The results show that students understand well the information about MBKM delivered by the supervisor and the organizing committee. They believe that the information is appropriate, clear, and correct, and have satisfaction with the MBKM information they receive.

Keyword: MBKM; Monitoring; Communication quality; Communication satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References

Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2004). The effect of communication quality and quantity indicators on intimacy and relational satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504042839

Hasanah, U., Handoyo, A. H., Ruliana, P., & Irwansyah, I. (2018). Efektivitas E-Mail Sebagai Media Komunikasi Internal terhadap Kepuasan Komunikasi Karyawan. Inter Komunika : Jurnal Komunikasi, 3(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.33376/ik.v3i2.233

Kandlousi, N. S. A. E., Ali, A. J., & Abdollahi, A. (2010). Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Concern of Communication Satisfaction: The Role of the Formal and Informal Communication. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n10p51

Kim, J. N., Oh, Y. W., & Krishna, A. (2018). Justificatory Information Forefending in Digital Age: Self-Sealing Informational Conviction of Risky Health Behavior. Health Communication, 33(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242040

Luoma-aho, V., Okkonen, L., & Canel, M. J. (2020). Public Sector Communication and Citizens. The Handbook of Public Sector Communication, 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263203.part4

Nasution, L. M. (2017). STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF. Jurnal Hikmah, 14(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01626a006

Neuman, L. (2014). Social Research Methods; Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Seventh Edition. In Pearson. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488

Wijaya, B. S. (2012). International Research Journal of Business Studies (IRJBS) The Development of Hierarchy of Effects Model in Advertising. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 5(1), 73–85. http://www.irjbs.com/index.php/jurnalirjbs/article/view/98

Zellatifanny, C. M., & Mudjiyanto, B. (2018). The type of descriptive research in communication study. Jurnal Diakom, 1(2), 83–90.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36722/jaiss.v3i1.994